President Donald Trump has officially nominated Amy Coney Barrett to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the U.S. Supreme Court.

As expected, Democrats and the media immediately began attacking her and demanding that Ginsburg’s former seat remain vacant until after November’s election.

Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has threatened to use impeachment as a tool to keep Trump from replacing Ginsburg with Barrett, and liberal CNN anchor Don Lemon even went as far to say “We're going to have to blow up the entire system. And you know what we're going to have to do? You're going to have to get rid of the electoral college because the minority in this country decides who the judges are and they decide who the president is.” "If Joe Biden wins, Democrats can stack the courts and they can do that amendment and get it passed”

But many Republicans and conservatives have called to immediately begin the process to install Barrett as Ginsburg’s replacement.

In 2016 after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, Ginsburg said herself that “nothing in the Constitution prevents a president from nominating to fill a court seat. That’s their job. There’s nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last year."

As RNN continues our coverage of the Supreme Court vacancy, we are gathering the public’s opinion on replacing Ginsburg.

Should President Trump’s nominee Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg?